The table illustrates how different households altered in Great Britain between 1971 and 2007. The units are measured in percentages.
Overall, it is apparent that there was an increase in changes in families including one person, no children and lone parent whereas the percentages of households with dependent and non-dependent children experienced a downward trend over the given period. Additionally, no data was provided regarding the one-family households and couples.
It is noticeable that the figures for all three types of households (one person, no children and single parent) almost doubled every decade. In 1971, the first form of household showed a 6% change, which then continued to rise reaching the peak of 12% in the final year. Similarly, starting at 4%, the percent change of lone parent households increased reaching the same percentage with the previous household in 2007. In the families without children, the modification totalled 19%, followed by a constant growth to 25% in 2007.
Regarding the families with dependent children, the figure started at 52% in the first year, which was the highest change among all the families. However, it began to fall hitting the lowest point of 36% in 2007, which was still the biggest number. Likewise, non-dependent children families also saw a decline from 10% to 9% during this thirty-six-year period.
- the plans below show a public park when it was first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 89
- Young people are often the first to suffer when job opportunities are scarce In which ways does age affect employment opportunities How might employees deal with the issues fairly 84
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 69
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, likewise, regarding, similarly, so, still, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31797235023 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88636755643 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603686635945 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.4913135577 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.909090909 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152031907163 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636953246371 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651456392091 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110604215344 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692696348693 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.