Some scientists think that there are intelligent forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Other scientists think that it is a bad idea and would be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Since the discovery of various planets in the cosmos, there is a question about whether humans alone in the universe or there are other intelligent races. While many scientists conduct searches for habitable planets and even send signals to aliens, some experts have warned this could be disastrous. In my opinion, though this satisfies basic human curiosity, the risk is too great relative to the benefits.
On the one hand, some believe that communicating with extraterrestrials will bring benefits to humanity. According to them, some friendly civilizations are willing to help us with their advanced development. This will not only solve some unsolvable issues such as climate change or natural resources shortage but also help us understand more deeply about the universe. Other proponents suggest that these extraterrestrials would help us avoid natural catastrophes or deadly pandemics in the future.
On the other hand, some opponents believe that connecting with extraterrestrial intelligence would lead to catastrophic consequences. They argue that other life forms are at least several centuries advanced than us. In the event that aliens found were hostile and malevolent, it could pose serious problems and in the worst-case scenario threaten the survival of the human race. Moreover, in human history, contact between two societies with a substantial gap of cultural development usually leads to the demise of the more primitive one. Likewise, in the case of connecting with extraterrestrials, human civilization could be collapse when confronted with the technology, belief, and lifestyle of other life forms.
In conclusion, the outcome of trying to communicate with extraterrestrial intelligence depends on many factors that cannot be fully known at that time. However, I am firmly convinced that this can be harmful and even completely destroy human civilization.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-30 | dhuy | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-30 | Luisjackiet | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-30 | Luisjackiet | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-19 | vyhanh | 84 | view |
- Some argue younger people are not suitable for important positions in the government while others think this is a good idea Discuss both views and give your opinion 93
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both of 84
- Some people say that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree 78
- In many countries women are allowed to take maternity leave from their jobs during the first month after the birth of their baby Does advantage outweigh disadvantages 78
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 290, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...ssues such as climate change or natural resources shortage but also help us understand mo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, while, at least, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57491289199 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18375393803 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634146341463 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1302546112 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.285714286 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183745643621 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617190609807 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040408342309 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106706727269 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330453019208 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.