The bar graphs illustrate how the percentages of remuneration in 7 countries changed between the periods 2000-2007 and 2008-2012.
Overall, it is apparent that countries like Germany and Canada did not experience any downward trend in the final four-year period while there were reductions in the percentages of the remaining countries. Interestingly, the only nation with the highest and lowest rates in wages throughout the given period was the UK.
From 200 to 2007, the wage rate in Canada generally decreased with downward fluctuations in between, and reached the peak of more than 4% in the year 2005. Similarly, the British earned the highest salaries in 2000, at almost 5%, after which the figure saw a marked decline. Although France and the US did not witness any negative outcomes in this regard, their proportion was generally fall from nearly 1.5% to below 1% and from slightly above 3% to exactly 2%, respectively. Regarding Germany, Italy and Japan, the percentages were the lowest among all seven countries, ranging between around 2% and approximately -1.8%.
Turning to the period between 2008 and 2012, there were no negative figures in terms of compensation in Canada and Germany, with the income bracket ranging between more than 1% and above 2%. The rest had falls, with Italy at about -0.8 and The UK comprising nearly -2.2% at the highest.
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 85
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- the plans below show a public park when it was first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 95
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 387, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'fallen'.
Suggestion: fallen
... regard, their proportion was generally fall from nearly 1.5% to below 1% and from s...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11607142857 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71639955283 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611607142857 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.202514299 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193459916941 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801900117187 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857401725126 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135821096546 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908687422579 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.