The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010
The chart examines the levels of donation contributions by British people of different ages in two different years - 1990 and 2010.
Overall, a greater percentage of British people gave money to charity in 1990 than in 2010 except for the people who were over 50 years old. It is worth noticing that, elder people donated more for charity than their younger counterparts.
In 1990, 42% of the 36-50 age-group in Britain made charitable donations, and this figure is the highest on the chart. The 18-25s contributed the least at only 17%. By 2010, these figures had fallen significantly to 35% and 7% respectively. The level of donations from the 26-35 age-group also experienced a decrease in 2010 from 31% to 24%.
While donations up to the age of 50 declined across the two years, they rose among the 51-65 age-group from 35% to nearly 40%, which was the highest percentage for 2010. The figure for the over 65s was lower than this, at 35% but it was still a little higher than the 1990's figure of 32%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-21 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Bao Chau Phan | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | oanhlilies | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | preetsidhu29500@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | cinderel | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentages of the UK workforce in five major industries in 1841 and 2011 40
- Cambridge IELTS 5 test 5 task 1 11
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72316384181 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5500915272 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604519774011 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4286702231 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8888888889 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290924946639 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120124730284 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106836449025 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195006400554 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917168094778 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.