The chart below gives information on the percentages of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
The chart displays the percentage of British people making charitable donations by age range between 1990 and 2010.
In general, people aged 18-50 donated more in 1990 while the over 50 British gave more money to charity by 2010.
As can be seen, approximately 42% of people aged 36-50 contributed to charity, which is the highest figure of 1990. By contrast, those 18-25-year-old counterparts donated the least, with only 17%. In 2010, however, the proportion soon fell to 35% and 7% respectively. The same trend also went for the age of 26 - 35, whose percentage of people in 1990 was 1,2 times higher than 2010.
On the other hand, it is witnessed that more British aged over 50 made charitable donation in 2010 than their counterparts two decades earlier. From the percentage of 35% in 1990, the number of the age 51-65 experienced an increase to approximately 40%, the top data among different age ranges of 2010. The figure then experienced a slight fall by 2% and 5% respectively when it comes to the age of over 65.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-21 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Bao Chau Phan | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | oanhlilies | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | preetsidhu29500@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | cinderel | view |
- The pie charts display the proportion of key sources of energy used in the USA between 1980s and 1990s
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003 to 2012 61
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 61
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her than 2010. On the other hand, it is witnessed that more British aged over 50...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76404494382 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77590114471 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61797752809 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8547700783 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2222222222 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340644235283 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142832509158 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102697157134 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23923538173 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714290091884 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.