the chart below gives information on the percentage of british people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.
IThe bar chart demonstrates the proportion of British citizens donating money for charitable purpose by different age groups between 1990 and 2010.
In general, groups of 36 years and older are groups have highest the figure of British people donating lots of money to charity while groups have age from 18 to 35 are groups have the percentage of British citizens contributing money to charity lower than older groups.
Regarding the proportion for citizens in age group from 36 to 50 years in 1990 was rose highest in this chart approximately 43% but the figure was reduced 8% British people donating money for charitable purpose around 35% in 2010. Moreover, in both 1990 and 2010, the percentage of British individuals giving money to charity in two groups of age from 51 to 65 was had second highest and age over 65 years approximately 35%, 33% and 39%, 35% respectively.
The figure for British citizens contributing money to charity by age group from 18 to 25 years which was group have the percentages lowest between 1990 and 2010 about 17% and 7% respectively. Nex to, age group from 26 to 35 years had the proportion of British individuals giving money for charitable purpose about 31% and 24% respectively for the years 1990 and 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-21 | Kshitij Kasabekar | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Bao Chau Phan | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | oanhlilies | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | preetsidhu29500@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | cinderel | view |
- Most people do not care enough about environmental issues Do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Most people do not care enough about environmental issues Do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Most people do not care enough about environmental issues Do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 67
- Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally whereas other people think that they should concentrate on only subjects they find interesting and they are the best at Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, regarding, second, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8779342723 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71140478892 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.403755868545 0.547539520022 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.8664437006 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.166666667 112.824112599 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.5 22.9334400587 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409248069884 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.261593332391 0.103423049105 253% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458510320717 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2915861561 0.15604864568 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808811861342 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 13.2329268293 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.