In some countries people spend long hours at work. Why does this happen? Is it positive or negative development?
In the 21st century, a person is referred to as “too laid back” or “lazy” if she or he does not contribute to at least 12 hours each day at the workplace. In countries like the United States and India, working for 70 hours in a week is worn as a badge of honour, which often determines how hardworking the employee is. The consequences of a poor work-life balance are numerous, and this negative impact on a person lasts much longer than expected.
Companies from around the world often use obscene amounts of remuneration as the driving force behind such long work hours. Employees are motivated by offering prize money, a surge in their income or a separate payment for their so-called dedication. In such cases, greed and need both take the centre stage, as some people are desperate to improve their lives, while others are never satisfied with the amount of money they receive. Toxic work environments can be compared to a rat race, where every employee competes for favours and promotions dangling at the end of the finish line.
A strenuous workplace environment further seeps into an employee’s personal life. For example, if a person is stuck at his office for more than 10 hours, he is too exhausted to spend any quality time with his family members at home. By the time he reaches his house at 10 o’clock in the night after a tedious day, he will refuse to even speak properly due to the overexertion he has subjected himself to. Not to mention, such long hours also affect the person’s health severely. Frequent loss of sleep, proper nutrition and sanity will eventually lead to physically life-altering ailments in the long run. The negative impact of excessive long work hours disrupts a life which used to be normal and joyful.
To draw a conclusion, in my honest opinion, overworking has become a serious threat to a person’s mental and physical well-being. A 60-hour week is not a medal or trophy which is to be showcased for the world to see. Nobody has been able to put a price tag on a healthy lifestyle. Hence, stricter laws must be put into place in order to prevent companies from exploiting people in such a horrendous manner.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-13 | vidung | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-27 | phamkhuyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-27 | Fila | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | Sushmabenarji | 73 | view |
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen Is it positive or negative development 84
- The bar chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in Australia divided into three categories from 2001 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia present and in future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 78
- In some countries only a few young people go to classical music concerts or play classical music Why Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, well, while, at least, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75661375661 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68219005684 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613756613757 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2512596692 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.764705882 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2352941176 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213487503251 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586839690246 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480750569081 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116530422079 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600650699016 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.