Scientists predict that in the future cars will be driven by computers. What are reasons behind this? Is it positive or negative development?
Automatic cars which are driven by computer are predicted to appear in the future by scientists. This essay will explain the reason of this trend and try to elaborate why this is positive development.
To begin with, it can be seen that technology improvement is increasing quickly, specifically automatic transportation such as cars. By this, it means that inventors are eager to level up automatization of cars, due to the fact that the development of computer programs such as artificial intelligence flourish fast. In addition, people nowadays argue that automatic cars which are driven by computer program could possibly ease their work inasmuch as they do not have to drive their own cars by themselves. Moreover, some companies focusing on automatic cars try to make some innovation. For instance, Tesla provides an automatic car which is controlled by program and it will be sold in the future.
Considering the positive developments, by the development of automatic cars, people would be possibly eased since they could focus to others task while they drive. Besides that, car automatization has auto navigation system. It means that the driver does not need to use GPS for searching location. Furthermore, car industries would obtain lots of income as more and more people tend to chose auto-pilot car. In addition, by using automatic cars could possibly reduce car incident because it reduces human involvement. Providing some data, many car incidents happen because of human error. If we drove auto-pilot car, it would be saver since there is no human.
To sum up, it can be said that technology improvement, people trying to ease their live and innovation being done by car’s companies are the reason why this trend possibly can happen. Personally, I assume that this is positive development since it could ease people work and cars’ companies will gain more money.
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 67
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possession Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent you do agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Some people think they have right to use as much fresh water as they want Others believe government should tightly control the use of fresh waters as it is limited resource Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The bar graph below depicts the information about four different transport modes used by people in a European City from 1960 to 2000 78
- In many countries more and more people buy a wider range of household goods like a TV set microwave oven Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 409, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...rs which are driven by computer program could possibly ease their work inasmuch as they do not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...r. In addition, by using automatic cars could possibly reduce car incident because it reduces ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, in addition, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16339869281 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86725552696 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539215686275 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2699656967 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.75 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296466027638 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103574615651 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735742082155 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224477571649 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994820590109 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.