The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia present and in future.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given diagram illustrates the Australian water supply system observed in the present times, which also acts as the possible scheme that will be maintained in the foreseeable future.
Water purified inside the dams or storage units is supplied directly to all required aspects of the community, like households, factories, shops and other facilities located within the city. The wastewater generated from these establishments, as well as the byproducts of dams and storage, are collected with the help of a separate pipeline and transported to the treatment plant.
The city and its amenities also participate in the collection of rainwater, a process which is commonly referred to as rainwater harvesting. During thunderstorms and rain, the surplus amount of water is collected by the shops, factories and households in the city; this water is eventually drained back into the rivers, which may act as the major source of water in the given geographical area.
- The bar chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in Australia divided into three categories from 2001 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 Summarize the information by describing the main features of the charts and making comparisons where appropriate 78
- In some countries only a few young people go to classical music concerts or play classical music Why Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more 56
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia present and in future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33986928105 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98070747099 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.653594771242 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.0144415478 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.4 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110835291305 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536158285143 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546677247545 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797288579445 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490994989758 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 61.2550243902 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.06136585366 133% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.