In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Today, people suffer from a variety of diseases due to the consumption of fast food. Some countries believe that taxes should be introduced to prevent fast food. During the essay, we will explore the benefits and harms of taxes levied by states for fast food.
On the one hand, our bodies need a balanced diet. It is right for states to impose a tax on fast food. Because people like hot-dogs, hamburgers, cheesburgers, cheeps. It is normal but, if we eat junk foods, we eat large amounts of additives because fast food is full of saturated fats and all the chemicals. It also is very dangerous for health. If they are taxed, food prices will rise and people will consume less fast food. The introduction of excessive amounts of intervention into the market can harm the economy so the state can prevent this by taxing.
Secondly, It is indisputable fact that, there are people in the world who live in difficult financial conditions. they choose fast food because it is cheap, tasty, convenient, easy to find everywhere, and quick to prepare.if the cost of food increases, such people will have less food and this will be a problem for them. Instead, the state should explain to the people how to have a healthy lifestyle.
To sum up, to cope with the health issue caused by an excessive consumption of fast food, the government should focus on advertising the healthy lifestyle to the citizen, rather than simply charging a higher tax on fast food.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | Trinh-tuan | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | my220904 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | nobody123456789 | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | Giang Tran | 89 | view |
- The chat below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2021 and future projection of 2025 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 20 for test purposes use and refer to the current year
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...live in difficult financial conditions. they choose fast food because it is cheap, t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to fast'
Suggestion: to fast
...icult financial conditions. they choose fast food because it is cheap, tasty, conven...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77075098814 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57429710355 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5143680742 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2142857143 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337539152695 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117454478449 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836305633727 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218955588629 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412794510814 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.