College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
The true purpose for college students to receive education remains a heated debate. Opinions are divided over whether students should choose their majors led by interests or based on lucrative reasons. In my opinion, there is no correct answer to this one since every student need to seriously weigh the pros and cons before any decision is made.
It is generally believed that most students expect jobs with high incomes after graduating from college, and thus it is easy to understand why students are recommended to choose their majors based on the anticipated opportunities of jobs. People need to earn money in order to make a living. Especially for ones who have the responsibilities to take care of the family, financial burden will indeed be a practical factor when considering what to study.
Nevertheless, disagreement drew upon this issue states that choosing what to do will be a life-long accompany. If we decide our future work based on the earnings rather than our interests, we are more likely to burn out in the long run as we need to spend nearly half of our lifetime on work, not to mention the lack of motivation during studying. I believe that the main purpose of the education is to help students build fundamental knowledge structure and further develop specialization based on their advantages and interests. Through this way, students mastering in different areas can contribute meaningfully to the society and get happiness and satisfaction in return.
In addition, the argument has missed an important point that we are living in an ever-changing world nowadays. Majors now lead to a variety of jobs may not hold true in the future. Take the development of artificial intelligence for example; it has already let machines replace many human resources. It is difficult and hardly reliable to predict the future job market. Hence, choosing majors based on students' interest have its own merits. After all, persistence and dedication are believed to lead to fruitful results in almost every field.
In conclusion, while job availability can be an influential factor while deciding a major, I think careful evaluation of various aspects of this issue is required so that the decision will not be a regretful one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-23 | Nanggyu Park | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Jhon Kwame | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | wopona8219 | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-05 | sahil nain | 62 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | Winner | 66 | view |
- In business education and government it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust 54
- According to an independent poll of 200 charitable organizations overall donations of money to nonprofit groups increased last year but educational institutions did not fare as well as other organizations Donations to international aid groups increased th 57
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States Only about 2 percent of customers have complain 83
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field 58
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework whereas in the district of Marlee most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no mo 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, while, after all, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 369.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09756097561 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88211095439 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612466124661 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 604.8 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8318103819 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.647058824 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 5.21951772744 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215256709813 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578699768172 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541500561797 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103821912344 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376382606443 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.