Some people think that the government should knock down old buildings and make
way to new buildings.
Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays construction is growth engine of any nation for become developed country. Although
many people believe that government needs to demolish old buildings and construct new buildings. I
partially agree with given statement. My position is argued further with explanations.
At the outset there are a plethora of reasons why government should be razed to the
ground old
buildings and the first and foremost is in old times most of inhabitant areas were constructed on
horizontal buildings concept and they consume more lands. Hence local authority needs to destroy
old horizontal building to free more ground for new vertical buildings which provide more space in
less ground. Moreover old abandoned buildings are not properly maintained by government and due
to less strength it can be fall down and damaged nearest buildings and cause traffic jam. In addition it
should use for illegal activities by culprit.
However, I would not overlook the other side too. To begin with, ancient buildings are consider as a
heritage places and responsible authority take care of this kind of sites and provide facilities for
people to visit. Furthermore some of old buildings were constructed by well-known artists and it is
known for its architecture design, so old buildings are useful for people and use for increase revenue
of nation.
In conclusion, it can be said that for developing new infrastructure for citizens, governments should
destroy old buildings for more lands. On the other hand old historical buildings should maintain by
local authority and use as a tourist attraction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-14 | Shivampatan143 | 41 | view |
- Public celebrations national days festivals are held in many countries Some people say that these celebrations are a waste of money and we should spend money on more important things Do you agree or disagree 84
- More and more people are opting for distance education these days What are the benefits of this trend According to you is it a positive or a negative development 91
- Some people think that the government should knock down old buildings and make way to new buildings Do you agree or disagree 41
- Compare and contrast electronic media with print media Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience 82
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the price of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 12, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...t areas were constructed on horizontal buildings concept and they consume more lands. He...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...gs concept and they consume more lands. Hence local authority needs to destroy old h...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 14, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ich provide more space in less ground. Moreover old abandoned buildings are not properl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 42, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'damaged the nearest'.
Suggestion: damaged the nearest
...o less strength it can be fall down and damaged nearest buildings and cause traffic jam. In add...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 94, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...est buildings and cause traffic jam. In addition it should use for illegal activities b...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 88, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...o. To begin with, ancient buildings are consider as a heritage places and responsible a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 18, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...rovide facilities for people to visit. Furthermore some of old buildings were constructed ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, look, moreover, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40711462451 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8791963724 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577075098814 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5825885139 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.230769231 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 17.0 4.38176352705 388% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322985763117 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115749689612 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847369039308 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109402796435 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825610920516 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.