Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems.
Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your position could be challenged.
The prompt urges that by the virtue of science and technology human being will be capable enough to solve all the problems of society. For some obvious reason I would like to be "mostly disagree" with the incentive and hereby I am obliged to provide necessary elaboration of certain points in defense of my position.
First of all - the term provided in the prompt "problems" is kind of devoid of proper definition as it will vary from different perspectives. Problems mosty are of two types - one is intelluctual or mental one, if say - the psychological one and the other one is the technical one. Now depending on the impact and kind of treatment a problem needs, the solution and the way of pursuing that solution differs. In most cases, we can see that the technical problems of a society; such as - development of roadside safety, sufficient security for adults as well as children and also many types. These types of solutions can be solved by taking advantages of certain inventions of science and technologies, for example - people can use magnetic ringbell for the purpose of maintaining safety of their properties and things, use of different types of ambulatory utilities to transfer properties from one place to another. For these types of problems of a society, science and technological solutions are enough. But what happens when the problem persists in the mind and the intellect of people?
Solving mental or psychological problems are not as easy as to solve the technical ones. Major reason lies in the abstractional differences between these two types of problems. The latter one is much more tangible than the vicarious one. Morever, the solution process of the technical problems of a society do not require sensitive handling whereas the mental ones require a great deal of patience and compassion. For example - some problems which have been sustained in the societies of earlier human beings; jealousy - according to many pundits - "the darkness of heart" - the root cause of many secondary problems. This darkness of heart lets people to do harm of the people and in some extreme cases compels the precarious ones to do the worst of the crimes. Now according to the prompt - how science and technology can solve this type of problem and also is it even possible to do so?
Some people might say that - different branches of science are being developed enough to deal with the visceral problems of the society. Yes, there is nothing wrong in the fact that science is developing day by day to redress this type of problems. But again saying, what is the probability that the availability of those facilities are within the reach of simple people, to say majority of the society? Artificial inteliigence has been evolved - helping people to understand people more tantamountly than before. However, none of advantages of the scientific hands are within the limit of the simple people that they can gain favor from the incentives - let alone to solve their mental problems.
Also, it is the very fact that scientific inventions have been quite successful to deal with the secondary problems; progenited by many mental problems, nevertheless, still lacks to address the proper solution of the root problem. It is no matter how much we are efficient in solving the lineages of the problems if we can not take the account of the basic ones or the fundamental ones. So, looking at the factors aforementioned and also the availability of the resources of science and technology to solve different problems of society - we can safely conclude that - yes, science can address most of the problems of a society which are mere technical and tangible but not the ones which are more abstract, intangible and related to the intellect of human beings.
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station To reverse a decline in listener numbers our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock music format The decline has occurred despite population growth in o 73
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the 83
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 63
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep th 59
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children s schools Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, so, still, well, whereas, as to, for example, kind of, such as, as well as, first of all, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 97.0 58.6224719101 165% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3161.0 2235.4752809 141% => OK
No of words: 629.0 442.535393258 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02543720191 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.00798087137 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89040647272 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43720190779 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1000.8 704.065955056 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.0123325665 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.708333333 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2083333333 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224828030728 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701376759044 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591627951625 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144196477587 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370432950767 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.