The charts show the info about the use of Internet in five countries in Europe in 2000.
The bar chart and pie chart illustrate the percentage of Internet usage in Germany, Sweden, France, Spain and America countries in Europe in the year 2000.
It is clear that Sweden, which used Internet, was the highest percentage comparison with another areas. We can also see that the most common the average of country spending on shopping on the Internet was America.
Looking more closely at the bar chart, at 35% people used Internet in Sweden. By contrast, only 5% population accessed to Internet in Spain. Furthermore, United Kingdom was the second high percentage, in which used Internet, account for 20%, followed by Germany with 20% and France with 10%.
According to pie chart, there was a quick increase in the proportion off people who spent on shopping on the Internet in Sweden, at 76%. Nevertheless, the use of Internet in UK is higher than the figure for those spending on shopping mall on the Internet in Sweden, at 87%. Additionally, a significant risen in the proportion of people who used Internet on shopping was recorded for Germany and France, at 46% and 57% respectively, followed by Spain, at 10%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-12 | phamkhuyen | 100 | view |
| 2023-09-12 | phamkhuyen | view | |
| 2021-11-04 | kevann | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-06 | phạm khánh linh | 79 | view |
| 2021-07-06 | phạm khánh linh | 11 | view |
- The charts show the info about the use of Internet in five countries in Europe in 2000 78
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- the diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australia town
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australia town
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 The pie charts illustrate the proportion of workers in manufacturing sales and services sectors in both towns at intervals of fifty years between 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92631578947 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73177668892 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542105263158 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7003212554 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24635644566 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1174784716 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645082319329 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176490117695 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635111869502 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.