People nowadays spend their free time less actively than in the past. Do you agree or disagree?
There is a common belief that people nowadays are more inactive than they used to be. In my opinion, I totally agree with this statement and the reasons will be presented below.
There are numerous explanations for this unhealthy lifestyle. The first one is the development of technology. Thanks to industrialization, more digital gadgets such as computers and smartphones become increasingly popular. The applications in these devices such as games, movies, and e-books are so interesting that users cannot prevent themselves from using them. As a consequence, the amount of time they used to spend doing sport decreases. Also, with the convenience of electronic devices, people now can communicate with each other via social networking sites more easily without having to commute from one place to another, which is sometimes very time-consuming and tiring. For instance, friends can interact with each other by making video calls or hold a conversation as long as their smartphones are equipped with Facebook or Zalo despite geographical distances.
The second factor contributing to this sedentary life is the hectic schedule that global citizens have. This means that they have to undertake a heavy workload or do overnight shifts in order to meet the deadlines. This leads to tiredness and stress. For this reason, the only thing officers and workers prefer doing as soon as they arrive home is relaxation. Instead of playing active sports namely football or volleyball which are very demanding, individuals would rather stay indoor to entertain themselves by reading books or watching their favorite movies. By doing this, they can gain more energy to get ready for the new day at work. If they do not refresh themselves, it is highly likely that their productivity at work will significantly be influenced.
To conclude, for the above reasons, I completely believe that people in the modern world are leading a less active life than in the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-22 | nguyenthiyennhi | 64 | view |
| 2021-10-26 | duongthingocdien | 61 | view |
- The maps below shows the museum s plant in 1998 and after some changes were made in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Rapid population growth in cities has brought with it many problems What are these problems How can the quality of life of city residents be maintained 84
- Write about the following topic Most people are not interested in how their food has been produced They only care about how much it costs How true is this statement What influences people when they buy food Give reasons for your answer and include any rel 89
- Some say that because many people are living much longer the age at which people retire from work should be raised considerably To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 763, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... work will significantly be influenced. For the above reasons, I completely beli...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23003194888 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89678592551 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635782747604 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5289835962 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2941176471 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4117647059 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11764705882 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185349446162 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525123750385 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624427329278 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127014965383 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561918820945 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.