Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society. To what extent, do you agree or disagree?
In the contemporary era, people’s quality of life í now advanced; thus, non-profit activities are also being accentuated much more than before. It is s common thought that adolescents should be compelled to get involved in philanthropic works because of its utilities for both individuals and community . I somewhat concur with this outlook.
It is undeniable that participating in charitable campaigns plays a crucial role in juveniles’ maturations. Youngsters who join humanitarian assistance tend to be more mature than disengaged counterparts. Meaning that they have lenient thoughts which enable the young to witness diverse facets of life. Throughout this procedure, pragmatic experiences are what participants can attain. There are more and more recruitments lean on applicants’ factual experience, hence, people will have dominance over other counterparts to win good jobs. Moreover, taking part in benevolent action is an excellent way to aid people in need which encourages young adults to be more sympathetic and to be good members of society.
Notwithstanding, there are some antagonistic assessments that doing charitable work is up to people’s willingness. In fact, not all people have the same amount of time for societal activities. If obliged, people will not throw themselves wholeheartedly into it, this renders lenient activities meaningless. The others consider that giving prominence to volunteer prompts declines in students’ academic outcomes as they don’t have adequacy of time to grind away. This tendency unwittingly deteriorates pupils’ attainment as well as prowess.
All in all, unpaid work is a voluntary choice, not an obligation. Although there are both cons and pros of this trend, it is still worth contemplating to encourage juveniles to work toward humanitarian actions.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 84
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue 84
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowl 84
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed Is this a negative or positive development 89
- Many students now have the opportunity to study in other countries Studying abroad may bring some benefits to some students but it also has a significant number of disadvantages Discuss both sides of the argument and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ities for both individuals and community . I somewhat concur with this outlook. I...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, look, moreover, so, still, thus, well, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69597069597 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30486291992 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.681318681319 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5100940501 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1875 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0625 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267550435952 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734118634198 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540417958754 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144914764491 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402676744782 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.48 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.03 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.