The bar chart illustrates the amount of money was used for purchasing various forms of amusement from 1995 to 2000 in Asia, Europe, and the United States.
Overall, the cash flow gradually increased throughout the whole period. Besides, publishing was seemingly the most popular content for which money was used the most in three given areas.
Firstly, in Asia, in 1995, the total amount of money spent was 67 dollars. The publishing has taken over 50% of the total amount, and about one-third of the total figure was spent on television. In 2000, the total amount doubled to 110 dollars, the cost of Television and publishing have occupied 70% of the total cost while video and cinema purchase contributed only over 20 percent of the total.
Secondly, in Europe, in 1995, resemble Asian purchase, Europeans spent most of the amusing money on publishing and television which account for over 75 percent of the total amount (97 dollars). The rest were used for music, video, and cinema entertainment which account only for less than 25%. In 2000, the proportions still maintain the former ones except for a rise of the total amount to 131 dollars.
Finally, the percentage of spending money on amusing in America is the same as the two areas but with an enormous total amount of money which is 184 dollars in 1995 and 257 dollars in 2000.
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish 78
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honeybee
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 78
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, firstly, second, secondly, still, third, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82608695652 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43165948765 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517391304348 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1623222986 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150105545366 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720288148325 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436653522224 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0900800501433 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230029550862 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.