The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates the proportion of the houses which was owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales from 1981 to 2011.
Overall, there was an equal share percentage of owned and rented accommodation in 1971 between two countries, however before 1971 rented houses are higher than owned property and the situation was opposite after 1971.
As seen in the graph, the rented accommodation was 50% higher than the owned accommodation in 1918 which consists of 75% of houses were rented and only 25 % were owned property. The proportion of rented accommodation started to decrease slightly in the following year, whereas the percentage of owned accommodation started to increase till both reached shared equal proportion in 1971.
The houses in owned accommodation started to increase slowly till 2001 before it decreased in 2011 which comprise 62 % of owned accommodation. However, the household in rented accommodation started to decrease rapidly till 2011 before it began to increase in 2001. The rented accommodation in household constitute 32% in 2011.
- The following line graph shows the three different reasons of weight exports from 1985 to 1990 73
- The bar graph represents the consumption of fruits and vegetables by men women and children in Britain from 2001 to 2008 67
- In most of the society and the role of mother and father differs What are the causes of this difference what will be the parental roles in the future 56
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 73
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any re 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tween two countries, however before 1971 rented houses are higher than owned prop...
^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... graph, the rented accommodation was 50% higher than the owned accommodation in 1...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41071428571 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02927469707 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464285714286 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2670419878 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.857142857 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254041514127 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152740336826 0.103423049105 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382738182712 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175056563356 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237544988893 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.