The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004/5
The line graph illustrates how many commuters used national rail network, London Underground and light rail & metro systems in Great Britain from 1950 to 2004/5.
Overall, the National rail network and London Underground witnessed a fluctuation during the period shown and they had quite a similar trend from 1980 to 2004/5. Furthermore, the number of people using light rail & metro systems was always the smallest during the period from 1960 onwards.
In the year 1950, there were one billion and nearly 750 million passenger journeys made on the national rail network and London Underground in turn, while light rail & metro systems was not put into use. Over the next 32 years, the national rail network and London Underground hit the lowest point of about 625 and 500 million journeys respectively in 1962. Light rail & metro systems appeared around 1962, then the quantity of people using it dropped gradually to 0 in 1980
From 1980 onwards, there was a substantial increase of 500 each in the number of the national rail network and London underground users,and the trend for both ways of transport was quite similar. Light rail & metro system underwent a slight increase to over 125 million users in 2004/5.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 78
- The graph below shows the average number of Vietnamese students study in France Russia and America between 2000 and 2015 81
- The bar chart below give information about five countries spending habits of shopping on consumer goods in 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the average number of Vietnamese students study in France Russia and America between 2000 and 2015 73
- The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... using it dropped gradually to 0 in 1980 From 1980 onwards, there was a substanti...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...ail network and London underground users,and the trend for both ways of transport wa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.105 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49169471128 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.8995591944 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.857142857 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114199173865 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654996648325 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530234843196 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858466846887 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518552321834 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.