Educating youngsters is prioritized by all countries; however, some individuals think that providing education to illiterate young adults is compulsory and allocating more finances ought to be done. This essay disagrees that country’s education system should mainly focused on increasing literacy of adults rather than young children, who are vital for the future, because that will definitely leads to economic collapse and reduced number of innovative people.
Economy of a country always rely on great minds of professionals in almost all industry. In other words, boosting of economy can only become a reality if only intelligent people, such as engineers, environmentalists, economists, are behind every process. Obviously, in order to make more and more such valuable employees, authorities must give the priority to primary and secondary education rather than to youth, who have already missed their early education. Put simply, by teaching them how to write and read, a nation can never achieve an economic growth, but only the higher literacy levels of the country. The best example is Singapore, where authoritative power’s main focus is schools even though the literacy and numeracy there are very low.
In addition to that, new inventions are extremely important for the development of a nation. Explorations and discoveries are always made by innovative people, who can think out of the box. Their inborn capabilities are always sharpened at the school, where they obtain a quality education. Were a government to allot more money on youth, who are most probably not able to become innovative, the country will also miss the younger generation, who are equipped with a lot of abilities and skills. This is supported by a recent study conducted by University of Colombo, in which they claimed that 95% of young inventors obtained knowledge in that particular area at the school.
In conclusion, globally, the priority goes to the young children’s education although some think that it should be shifted to make illiterate youth literate and more money should be allocated for that. This essay disagrees with that view point as it gives rise to economic downfall and lack of new inventors.
- This bar chart shows the number of private cars in millions of different cities from 1950 to 2000 Write a report 73
- If a person is given a choice between life without work and working a lot he would prefer to have a life without work Do you agree or disagree 90
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 87
- Some people say that physical education classes are an important part of a child s education Others believe that it is more important to focus on academics during school time Discuss both these views and give your opinion 82
- Some people think people working in creative arts should be financially supported by government Others think they should find financial support from other resources Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'focus'
Suggestion: focus
...ountry’s education system should mainly focused on increasing literacy of adults rather...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 672, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
... Singapore, where authoritative power’s main focus is schools even though the literacy and...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1868.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33714285714 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90275590375 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591428571429 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.9132906417 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.428571429 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248359700235 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731769478265 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798739725631 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15989795878 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080021955499 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.