Today many countries import food from different parts of the world. is this a negative or positive development?
It is no exaggeration to claim that flat world seems to facilitate the global trade when import or export practices are no longer strange. Although some lament that importing products from other countries takes a toll in general, I lean on the idea that the movement of purchasing goods brings more good than harm to the economy of both developing and developed countries.
On the one hand, poor quality along with high intake of toxic chemicals in products received provide an incentive to importing items produced by other countries. are deemed to be the main reasons. Firstly, the difference in quality criteria must be the reason for this hesitation. Some exporting countries set relatively low requirements for their manufacturing companies in order to help them export products to other foreign countries, which leads to the importers’ fear of quality. This somehow can receive the strong censure from customers in the importing countries since it does not give them the value of money. Secondly, the amount of contaminants in merchandise is another obstacle in boosting the trade between countries. In fact, it is fairly arduous to inspect all the imported items; therefore, buyers themselves cannot guarantee whether they are absorbing a high intake of poisonous chemicals into their bodies or not. Taking Vietnam’s shrimps as a great example when in the past they used to be banned to America’s market when the government of this country unveiled an over-allowed level of chemicals in some cargos. However, with the strict regulations imposed on both importer and exporter, these worries are no longer necessary.
Currently, importing field is considered as a useful tool to boost the economy of both parties involving the purchase. The term opportunity cost can demonstrate the correctness of this movement. It is widely accepted that each country has different strengths in manufacturing items; therefore, instead of wasting more material sources or labors in a particular product, they can particularly focus on another one which can bring higher benefits. That is why importing even can save manufacturing cost. Furthermore, in the importer perspective, thank to this trading practice, the unemployment rate can be addressed effectively. This is because a large number of uneducated workers now are able to work in different factories when the demand of importing products augments. Hence, the prospect of the economy is likely to be predicted.
In conclusion, trading with other countries is believed to bring more advantages to both importers and exporters.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-11 | transcendenceeee | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | caigicungduoc | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-04 | hungdung2507 | 73 | view |
- Task Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world Do you agree or disagree 60
- The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 73
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 73
- Task 1 The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below shows the annual number of rental and sales in various formats of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Are
...ting items produced by other countries. are deemed to be the main reasons. Firstly,...
^^^
Line 2, column 619, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... does not give them the value of money. Secondly, the amount of contaminants in ...
^^
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... addressed effectively. This is because a large number of uneducated workers now are able to work...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2175.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34398034398 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95664082578 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570024570025 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6342499518 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.473684211 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4210526316 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21276100968 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626572409897 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445182430187 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132301155323 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276056339031 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.