Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Is this a negative or positive development?
With the strong development of science and technology, robots are gradually taking the place of humans and becoming a common item of doing tasks at home and work at the office. From my point of view, this trend could have both positive and negative effects in equal measures.
On the one hand, there are some apparent benefits of the increasing use of robots for household chores and tasks in the workplace. The first advantage is that robots are a useful solution for the busy people’s homes. Robots can help them handle household chores such as cooking, washing, and cleaning in a quick way instead of spending an average of 2-3 hours per week doing those tasks. Besides, in large companies or offices, with the effective support of robots in handling paperwork, it has also reduced costs to pay for employees doing the same job, the accuracy in calculation tasks is also higher than humans do.
On the other hand, I would argue that several drawbacks of this development should not be overlooked. The first issue to mention is cost, the price of a robot is not reasonable for everyone who can own it at home, only rich or upper class people can afford to have such expensive technology. Between spending so much money to purchase a cleaning robot, most people will choose to make it by themselves. The more dependence on technology also affects the unemployment rate of working people as jobs are gradually replaced by robots, leading to many workers losing their main source of income.
To sum up, the growth in performance of robots in doing housework and work will have both beneficial and detrimental effects on individuals and on society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-11 | transcendenceeee | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | caigicungduoc | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-04 | hungdung2507 | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 78
- The diagram below shows the process of producing smoked fish 84
- Some people think that people who chose a job early and keep doing are more likely to get satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- Nowadays in many countries more and more people are spending their time away from their families Why is this What are the effects on themselves and on their families 73
- Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age Some think they should begin at at least 7 years old Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a quick way" with adverb for "quick"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... such as cooking, washing, and cleaning in a quick way instead of spending an average of 2-3 h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, look, so, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86572438163 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58730608067 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611307420495 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.3954803745 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.181818182 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297131488262 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968734166837 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644934555503 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173930291249 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874080496346 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.