Busy lifestyle in Metropolis has made it difficult for people to get along with their neighbors. This has caused lack of social life and limited assistance at times of emergency for big cities residence. In order to overcome the issue of limited social interaction, resident of big cities should plan frequent social gatherings and interactions.
Firstly, busy lifestyle has made limited social life for big cities residence. The demanding nature of jobs, hectic traffics, and competition to get ahead have resulted in for people to focus either on themselves or to the people of their interest. For example, recent research conducted by Harvard University shows that lack of social interaction in the neighborhood of big cities has resulted in a rise of psychological cases related to loneliness. Secondly, residents of metros are lacking help from their neighbors at times of emergency. People with certain health problems requiring immediate support are the worst one to be affected. For instance, publication from City Hospital has time and again shows the possibility of reduce casualties from heart attack if patients was supported on time by their neighbors.
At the same time, we can do a lot to overcome these issues of limited social life, and lack of support system by organizing more social interaction. Residences in big cities at least can plan weekly interaction and gathering program. This would not only enhance psychological health of individual but also creates a social support system needed at urgent hours. For example, recent experiment in one of the neighborhood of Kathmandu clearly indicates change in people's behavior pattern, and increased level of cooperation among residence when they start to have bi-weekly interaction.
To conclude, rise in urbanization has brought up various social issues including lack of social networking. This essay discuss the problems caused by unknown neighborhood such as lack of social life and emergency support system. Nevertheless, it also shed light on to overcome such problems which is to organize regular get together in the neighborhood.
- Some people today believe that it is acceptable to use physical force to discipline children but others feel it is completely unacceptable 81
- Some employers of er their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs believing that this will make their staf healthier and thus more ef ective at work Other employerssee no benefit in doing so Consider the arguments from both aspects of t 84
- 1 As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom 61
- Recently it is common for people not to know their neighbors What is the cause of this problem What can be done to solve this problem 67
- Many old cities around the world are going through a major process of modernization What are the advantages and disadvantages of modernization 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...ssistance at times of emergency for big cities residence. In order to overcome the iss...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...le has made limited social life for big cities residence. The demanding nature of jobs...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'discusses'.
Suggestion: discusses
...g lack of social networking. This essay discuss the problems caused by unknown neighbor...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gular get together in the neighborhood.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, at least, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39879154079 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94149063817 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534743202417 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5977763829 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6875 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177504379282 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657280506978 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460175299089 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115030995001 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253322186831 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.