Teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. . Do you agree or disagree?
Whether teachers should be paid according to how much students learn remains a question of heated debate. In my opinion, teachers shouldn’t be paid based on how much students learn for a variety of reasons.
First of all, this method would benefit neither teachers nor students. If teachers are paid according to how much students learn, they will push students to work too hard and force too many subjects onto students. This will make the lectures uninspiring and even foster an unhealthy school environment. In the long run, it will deprive students of enthusiasm and exposed them to negative thoughts such as dropping out of school. Also, not all the teachers are conscientious. They may start cheating on their students as soon as they get to know they will be paid based on their students’ improvements. For instance, they may not cover the whole syllabus for that particular semester and only teach the students those important questions that will appear on their final exams. Therefore, the students’ time and money would be wasted. More seriously, the sacred and respected profession of teaching will lose its value.
Secondly, how much students learn depends much on their intellectual capacities. A teacher’s explanation may conduce a better grasping of knowledge for some students but may not be suitable for others. Some students may perceive knowledge quickly, while others find it hard to understand and do not like attending the lectures. This can be quite tough for the teachers to deal with these students. To put the discussion into a wider context, consider a hard-working teacher who tries his level best to motivate his weak students, but the students do not show any signs of self-determination. In this way, it is unfair to evaluate the teachers based on the students’ improvements.
To recapitulate, based on the above discussion, although it is essential for the teachers to concern about their teaching methods and their students, it is not fair for them to be judged and paid based on their students’ performance.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-28 | nha1806 | 100 | view |
2023-10-11 | cogiaothuylinh | 10 | view |
2023-08-23 | Anvesh0910 | view | |
2023-05-12 | myahh | view | |
2022-09-23 | nthuthanh | 82 | view |
- Write an essay of about 250 words to suggest ways to promote creativity at school 70
- Ways to promote creativity
- Ways to promote creativity at school
- 19 Some people say that computers have made life easier and more convenient Other people say that computers have made life more complex and stressful Opinion 89
- Many people believe that the high levels of violence in films today are causing serious social problems What are these problems and how they could be reduced 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether teachers should be paid according to ho...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...eachers should be paid according to how much students learn remains a question of he...
^^^^
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...teachers shouldn’t be paid based on how much students learn for a variety of reasons...
^^^^
Line 2, column 109, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
.... If teachers are paid according to how much students learn, they will push students...
^^^^
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ing will lose its value. Secondly, how much students learn depends much on their in...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12797619048 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90594329752 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532738095238 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7661807631 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7222222222 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416046610984 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143256953474 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127192186546 0.0667982634062 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30097888483 0.151304729494 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11899694316 0.056905535591 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.