The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019
The given pie charts give information about the proportions of reasons that adults using their cell phones in Africa between the years 2016 and 2019.
Overall, the percentage of social networks was the highest of the four categories in Africa over the three year period. While social networks and digital camera saw an increase in the proportions used by African youngsters, the figures for email and phone calls reduced gradually over the period shown.
From the years 2016 to 2017,while social networks and email used by Africans fell slightly, with figures reducing by around 2% and 1% respectively, the opposite was true for the percentages of phone calls, rising by around 3% . Conversely, there was a stable remain in digital camera that young people used for their phones over the following year since 2016 in Africa.
Looking into the years 2018 and 2019, there were moderate changes in the percentages of networking sites and digital camera usage in Africa. Social networks had risen from 51% to 56% and by almost 2% of youngsters using digital camera. By contrast, Email and Phone calls in Africa had reduced by around 1% and 6% respectively over the years 2018 and 2019.
- The maps illustrate some changes that were made to a city hospital s transport infrastructure between the years 2007 and 2010 73
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 78
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 61
- The table give information about five types vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 2014 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...adults using their cell phones in Africa between the years 2016 and 2019. Overal...
^^
Line 2, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erall, the percentage of social networks was the highest of the four categories ...
^^
Line 2, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of social networks was the highest of the four categories in Africa over the ...
^^
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ighest of the four categories in Africa over the three year period. While social...
^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by Africans fell slightly, with figures reducing by around 2% and 1% respectivel...
^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ages of phone calls, rising by around 3% . Conversely, there was a stable remain i...
^^
Line 4, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...56% and by almost 2% of youngsters using digital camera. By contrast, Email and P...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 26.3917525773 144% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 937.175257732 106% => OK
No of words: 198.0 206.0 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0404040404 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51723184274 2.54303337028 99% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 127.690721649 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540404040404 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 290.88556701 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 16.3608247423 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.5889799684 44.8134815571 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.75 76.5299724578 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 16.8248392259 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 4.34317383033 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 2.54639175258 275% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203728605083 0.216113520407 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103705855316 0.0766984524023 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864913594446 0.0603063233224 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155481997036 0.12726935374 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0894584187377 0.0580467560999 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 8.37731958763 175% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 70.7449484536 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 7.45979381443 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 8.71597938144 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 41.2886597938 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 8.54432989691 136% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.