The table and pie diagram illustrates the total income spent on fish and details of various sources of fish which are imported to US during the years 1998, 1992 and 2000.
Overall, it is found that the expenditure spent on fish increased considerably from 1998 to 2000. Moreover, Fish import to America increased from china and reduced from Canada .However, all other nations fish business did not follow any particular pattern.
Initially, Cost spent on consumable fishes was 6.52 billion dollars in 1998 which raised by almost 30% by 1992 and later raised by 20% by 2000 and spent 10.72 billion dollars. Secondly, when the rate of fish import is taken into consideration in 1998, Majority of imports are from Canada which is 60% while the china constituted for 13% and all other nations ranged for 27% . By 1992, Canada's import almost decreased by half and reached 34%. Whereas, china raised its export by 7% and all countries supply other than these raised to by almost 80%. Moreover In 2000, China still expanded its business to 30 percent while Canada and remaining nations dropped their business by another 10% .
- In some countries the difference in age between parents and children is generally greater than it was in the past Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The bar graph below shows the amount of carbon emissions in different countries during three different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK between 2010 and 2012 78
- The numbers below show basic information about uses of leisure time among different age groups 78
- Some people use technology to take advice for their medical problems rather than seeing to doctor Why this is so It is positive or negative development according to you 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2 and 2000. Overall, it is found that the expenditure spent on fish increased ...
^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Fish) must be used with a third-person verb: 'imports'.
Suggestion: imports
...rably from 1998 to 2000. Moreover, Fish import to America increased from china and red...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...eased from china and reduced from Canada .However, all other nations fish business...
^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...sed from china and reduced from Canada .However, all other nations fish business did no...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d not follow any particular pattern. Initially, Cost spent on consumable fish...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Cost spent on consumable fishes was 6.52 billion dollars in 1998 which raised by ...
^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...13% and all other nations ranged for 27% . By 1992, Canadas import almost decrease...
^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Canadas import almost decreased by half and reached 34%. Whereas, china raised i...
^^
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd all countries supply other than these raised to by almost 80%. Moreover In 200...
^^
Line 5, column 572, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...er than these raised to by almost 80%. Moreover In 2000, China still expanded its busin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 695, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...remaining nations dropped their business by another 10% .
^^
Line 5, column 711, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s dropped their business by another 10% .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9417989418 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38954623246 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4168303861 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.75 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 1.69756097561 707% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185234957088 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898057677934 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974984851206 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174989235686 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11504823508 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.