In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe that the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Recently, the question of how to spend public money has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that ameliorating current public transport systems should take precedence over building new transport systems for bullet trains, while others argue otherwise. And I wholeheartedly agree with the former stand. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that establishing new, faster railway lines for bullet trains is more crucial than renovating existing public transport do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that these lines could facilitate the nationwide transport of goods and passengers, meaning that not only can citizens with relatives in other parts of the country meet each other with greater ease, but parcels are also able to be delivered quickly. Furthermore, the advent of these lines leads to a boom in domestic tourism, which invigorates economic growth and can even make it possible for the public to have an improved standard of living.
My opinion, however, is that the masses benefit a lot more from improving local and existing transport. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that current transport systems play an important role in citizens' daily lives given that the majority of the masses have a predisposition to make use of these systems on a regular basis in order to commute to and from work. In other words, an increase in the quality of existing transport exerts a positive influence on people's well-being. In addition, an astronomical sum of tax money is required to erect bullet train lines and facilities, placing a financial burden on the government. As an illustration, one recent study conducted by the government of China has demonstrated that the amount of money allocated to setting up bullet train lines is predicted to approximately six times higher than reforming current transport systems. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that upgrading existing public transport should be prioritised for the reasons discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- X 89
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- QQ2 Some people believe famous people s support towards international aid organizations draws the attention to problems while others think celebrities make the problems less important Discuss both views and give your 89
- QQ9 With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that upgradin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23097826087 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81808938404 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589673913043 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.7787960024 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302251526709 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870483113321 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05909770476 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17364764079 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389582573793 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.