The presented bar chart illustrates the comparison of the employment rates between male and female in six countries including Australia, Switzerland, Iceland, the UK, New Zealand and the USA, for two years 1995 and 2005.
A glance at the graphs reveals that men's employment ratio in all given countries was higher than women and those figures in Switzerland and Iceland were quite greater than the other four countries.
In 1995, the two highest employment rates of males were Iceland with roughly 70% and in Switzerland with about 65%. The proportion was precisely 60% in New Zealand whereas there was around 59% in the USA. Meanwhile, the numbers in Australia and the UK were approximately 55%. At the same time, this ratio of females was comparatively lower in New Zealand and Australia, just around 25% to 27%. In this year, Switzerland had the largest number of employed women, which was 56%.
Next 10 years, the percentage in the workforce surged at both rates of men and women. The male ratio in Iceland was still the highest over six countries with about 83% while the lowest was in Australia, a little less than 70%. The proportion in Switzerland at just under 68% was the highest for female rate when the lowest was in Australia with approximately 39%. Nevertheless, the number of men who had the occupation always surpassed this figure of women over the period.
- The bar charts illustrate the average house expenses in England and its capital city London and to present the comparison regarding the average house prices between distinct areas of England within the year 2013 82
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 89
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005 Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea and make comparisons where appropriate 73
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vely lower in New Zealand and Australia, just around 25% to 27%. In this year, Sw...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
nevertheless, so, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90557939914 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67930808531 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523605150215 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5097846168 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.909090909 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0898454248136 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03776255955 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440943308039 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0742641231914 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441766310601 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.