no
In the reading section, it proposes three reasons for replacing the “let it burn” policy by using the example of Yellowstone big fire. However, the listening section giving three reasons rejects the reason provided in the reading.
First of all, the author mentions that vegetation and countless trees were damaged by this big fire in Yellowstone. On the contrary, the speaker believes that the damaged plants would be covered by some new and more diverse plants. This is because it provides an opportunity for new plants to grow. For example, some seeds need a high level of heat to grow, so this big fire lets them grow!
Additionally, the professor does not agree with the writer saying that this big fire brings a huge problem for many wild animals, by saying that this big fire also creates an opportunity for many animals to grow, like plants. For example, some plants are replaced, so it creates an ideal habitat for some animals, like rabbits. In this case, some predators will eat rabbits, so the new food chain is created.
In the end, reading utters that the fire will cause serious negative effects for the local tourism. However, listening believe only when this big fire happens every year will cause stay away visitors. Because that year the weather was very dry and hot with so many big winds, all of these factors combined together, so this big fire was created. However, after that year no such combination happened again, so this kind of big fire would not be created again.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-10 | Bell Hayes | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-02 | ayumiyazaki | 66 | view |
| 2024-05-24 | ayumiyazaki | 88 | view |
| 2024-05-24 | ayumiyazaki | view | |
| 2024-04-16 | degew59415@eryod.com | 3 | view |
- do you agree or disagree with the statement students should be required to study basic science to graduate 71
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement colleges and universities should offer students better job preparation before they start working 73
- no 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement people should stop reading and listening to the news for a period of days and weeks 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that people who move out of their hometowns can be more successful than people who stay in their hometowns for a whole a life 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xample of Yellowstone big fire. However, the listening section giving three reaso...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, so, for example, kind of, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84108527132 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30949540036 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550387596899 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1344308737 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.083333333 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0280917948219 0.272083759551 10% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0137828663215 0.0996497079465 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457125961242 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0160057298768 0.162205337803 10% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277227373589 0.0443174109184 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.