The pie chart compares the generation of five distinct energy in France from 1995 to 2005.
Overall, it is noteworthy that petro production witnessed a drop while other energy generation experienced rose in 2005. Additionally, the most noticeable feature is that there was a great proportion of energy production using coal in both years 1995 and 2005.
In 1995, coal, gas and petro accounted for roughly one-third each of energy production in France. Over the next ten years, there was a slight rise to 30.93% of coal consumption, followed by 30.31% of gas. In contrast, the energy generation by petro nose-dived, with the figure ending at 19.55%.
Additionally, in 1995, only 6.40% of energy production was composed of nuclear while the remaining 4.90% was other types of energy, which was the lowest. At the end of the period shown, the percentage of nuclear went up to 10.10%. In a similar fashion, a parallel trend can be seen in the figure for other, which doubled that of 1995.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 67
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 76
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 56
- The map shows the development of Meadowside village and Fonton over three different time periods 1962 1985 and present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects But others believe that teenagers should focus on the subjects that they are good at or that they find the most interest Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a similar fashion" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ercentage of nuclear went up to 10.10%. In a similar fashion, a parallel trend can be seen in the fi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 829.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96407185629 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70241053453 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580838323353 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.5440223338 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.1111111111 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156357045834 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691743971383 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664895010144 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115809023617 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676814001156 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.