Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Hitherto, the globalization has consequence a variety of entertaining ways, and the question of whether reading books bring children more benefits than using high-tech devices or not has been raising public attention. While some people lament that the modern way is better, I oppose this view by giving some rational evidences.
First and foremost, imagination boost is one of book’s benefits that we can not ignore. On science view, the Concrete operational stage of development of kids is critical, so children must have rational way to increase imagination skill. By reading book, they can stand on many character’s perspectives, which makes children not only understand the story deeply but also force them to abstract-drawing a picture of the book. Although applying modern technologies into films and games, it still too pragmatic for kids to fully understand the story and badly affect their cognitive development. If they depend too much on available images, they will face with difficulty when learning abstract knowledge in their school
On the other hand, health problems are also taken into consider. A survey in the UK identify that kids who prefer reading book to playing computer games or watching Tv are less likely to have eyes and heart illness. It is conspicuous that the blue light coming from technology devices can damage kid’s health and lead to some foreseeable consequences in future, while book is the opposite, they provide children with safety way, helping them to relax after a hard-studying day and also protect their health. Furthermore, scientist also point out that children can remember more details by reading book than using modern entertainment.
In conclusion, reading book is better for kids than using high-tech ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | dieulinhxinhgai | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | bepmy2992004 | 67 | view |
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 76
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to a remote natural environment such as the South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 11
- Many people are traveling to other countries Why Is it a positive or negative development 67
- in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some ways Why is this Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- Some people believe that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...nce a variety of entertaining ways, and the question of whether reading books bring children more benef...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 683, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to abstract'
Suggestion: to abstract
...will face with difficulty when learning abstract knowledge in their school On the other...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...d lead to some foreseeable consequences in future, while book is the opposite, they provi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, still, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31071428571 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85079428602 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632142857143 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.735505175 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.181818182 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252714383998 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964791132068 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640294737008 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162721703203 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388458566311 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.