People today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out. What are the causes? What are the solutions?
In recent years, there has been widespread concern about safety, whether people are inside or outside their accommodation. This paragraph will analyze the underlying reasons and outline some feasible solutions to this phenomenon.
On the one hand, this problem has both understandable objective and subjective causes. In terms of staying at home, people still suffer from cyberbullying. In other words, with the advent of cutting-edge technology, electronic aggression can occur every time, normally on social platforms, where people can freely comment and criticize anonymously. Therefore, different from conventional bullying, everyone can be victimized everywhere by online bullying, even if they are in their own house. Moreover, burglary is also a notable factor that fuels people’s fear of being at home. According to research conducted by the FBI in 2015, the burglary sector made up for 20% of crime statistics, which is an alarming rate compared to previous years. When it comes to being out, crime appears obviously. There are a variety of offenders on the streets, especially in urban areas, ranging from robbers to killers; which are a potential danger to the residents. To conclude, there are several contributors to the anxiety for the safety of people either at home or when they are out.
Some viable solutions can be used to remedy the aforementioned issue. Firstly, using electronic devices intelligently and suitably is perhaps the best for dealing with cyberbullying. To illustrate, for example, in Facebook, people should not add friends with strangers and only follow wholesome pages. Secondly, people need to learn some basic defensive skills to protect themself from criminals both inside and outside their homes; however, if the adversary has a weapon, people should shout out for help or run as fast as possible.
To summarise the point, the reason why people do not feel safe whether they stay at home or out is wide-ranging, from cyberbullying, burglary for the fear of being inside home to a variety of crimes on streets. Nevertheless, some proactive practices are useful to address this phenomenon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-16 | hueyy | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | hueyy | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-14 | tieuquynh | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-03 | Nguyễn Ánh Lâm | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | Pau Nguyen | 84 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.375 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95636252261 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610119047619 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3239333707 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.235294118 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7647058824 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226441145572 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712467702215 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895318632958 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133184909781 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738401480854 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.