Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
__________
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
Morality and logical reasoning play a crucial role in today's evolving world. On one hand, morality restraints any ??? while on the other hand logical reasoning has defined many innovations that helped society. To pick one among the two is hard. The prompt shows the same perplexion between the two. It is often believed that teaching morality should be the foundation of education whereas some believe that teaching logical reasoning as a foundation would contribute more to society. I agree moderately with the statement that logical reasoning contributes more to society and should be taught as a foundation to the students because of the following reasons.
An increase in opportunities and innovations because of the advancements in society has to lead to more misleading outcomes. To illustrate the same, in the current generation people are more inclined towards the evils rather than choosing a more righteous path. And that is why it is important to develop a moral conscience among students. There will always be situations in life where people have to make decisions between right and wrong. It is then the innate moral conscience comes into action which allows us to choose a path that everyone benefits from. It is not just a course that the student will learn in college, but is more of a life lesson that will be inscribed in us for life and help us to make complex decisions.
However, development in logical reasoning among scholars has helped in the growth of the various sectors in the economy. For example, according to research people with developed logical reasoning had more innovation and could think out-of-the-box solutions for complex problems. This is the reason why more industries are focussing on hiring people with more logical thinking rather than a person with linear thinking. There are tests in a place that will calculate the efficacy of a person in logical thinking. With the advancement in society, improvement in logical thinking would help students to stand unique amongst the crowd.
The debated between morality and logical ability will never stop and it should not. Because one can never judge which is necessary. It is like comparing two eyes of the same person. It is important to have both in order to have a clear vision about something. And once you lose even an eye it becomes blurry and so do our decisions in life, if we compromise with one of the two. That is why even though it is more important to have the logical reasoning capability to grow in life, it is equally important to have a moral conscience to support your growth with inner peace.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 70 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | jayatyagi123@yahoo.co.in | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-07 | Aaishani De | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-21 | raghavchauhan619 | 62 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 66
- Claim Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Reason Many people s dreams are inherently selfish Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 54
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting lethargy and other signs of illness After the recall the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food an 74
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns w 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...n one hand, morality restraints any ??? while on the other hand logical reasoning has...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n one hand, morality restraints any ??? while on the other hand logical reasoning has...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lity will never stop and it should not. Because one can never judge which is necessary....
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, whereas, while, as to, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2169.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 438.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95205479452 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68409247341 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481735159817 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9797660813 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.375 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346180295829 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879171736775 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108873071289 0.0758088955206 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203589867167 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118977912798 0.0667264976115 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...n one hand, morality restraints any ??? while on the other hand logical reasoning has...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n one hand, morality restraints any ??? while on the other hand logical reasoning has...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lity will never stop and it should not. Because one can never judge which is necessary....
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, whereas, while, as to, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2169.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 438.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95205479452 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68409247341 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481735159817 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.9797660813 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.375 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346180295829 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879171736775 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108873071289 0.0758088955206 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203589867167 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118977912798 0.0667264976115 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.