In the past, most people lived in small villages where everyone knew everyone else. Nowadays, most people live in large cities where they only know a few people in their area.
What do you think were the advantages and disadvantages of living in a small community?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.
A long time ago, when science and technique was not developed, humans used to live together in small neighborhoods where they all knew each other. In my point of view, this lifestyle gave them both benefits and drawbacks.
Knowing every single person in one's area is a huge advantage for human to co-operate and flourish at high speed, especially when they did not have much knowledge of science. The ones who were stronger could use their power to protect everyone in the village from wild animal such as tigers, lions and gorillas. Moreover, with a huge number of people, they could find and store food for the winter so they were not in danger of being famish in hard periods. Also, different generation lived together, so grandparents could take care of children and the younger could gain experience from the elderly.
However, i think people staying together in the past might be a trouble due to some reasons. Firstly, if the grandparents were too old and weak to look after and protect children, one of the parents had to stay home and cared for them. This meant the family earned less than normal. In my view, the bigger problem was that the elderly could not pay so much attention to individual kids. As a result, the children sometimes were at stake of being attacked by wild animals or any things else.
To sum up, the benefits of people living in small villages and knew each other were grater than disadvantages. People were in stronger relationship, happier and helped by others whenever they were in trouble. Also, they would never have to face with loneliness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-30 | binhnek | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-01 | phuongnguyen1234 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | hlam91 | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | Dung Hanh | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | golemzzz2006 | 61 | view |
- The diagram show how plate glass and bottle glass are made Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The diagrams below show stages in the development of simple cooking equipment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work education or shopping To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- the maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip from 2005 to 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...acks. Knowing every single person in ones area is a huge advantage for human to c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...perience from the elderly. However, i think people staying together in the pa...
^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put after the verb 'were'.
Suggestion: were sometimes
...ividual kids. As a result, the children sometimes were at stake of being attacked by wild anim...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, so, i think, such as, as a result, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79197080292 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47293679217 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627737226277 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3804303752 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7857142857 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225836801687 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069237470208 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720766041686 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135531796674 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644242104827 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.