Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The statement mentions that some people believe that technology take our chances to interact with others. On the contrary, the prompt mentions that other people believe that technology can make more connection between people. I agree that technology provides unlimited communication between people.
First of all, it cannot be ignored that technology brings many easy ways to make connection to the whole world. Imagine a girl who lives and works in Los Angeles, but her whole family members live in Arizona. Definitely, there are many ways to keep contacted with her family. For example, she can easily take a plan only for few hours to see her parents. Facetime is another way for her that is much easier than booking a flight. Definitely technology make many easy ways for communication.
In addition, technology creates many opportunities for human interaction to develop a better World. Consider a Dietitian who lives in Sacramento, but she applies for a job in a nursing home in Orange County. It may take time and money for her to go to the multiple job interviews over there. But, with technology like Zoom she can easily see and talk to the manager for a job interview. Thus, surely with today's technology human interactions are much easier than before.
On the contrary, some people believe that technology innovations can reduce children or young people connection with others which can be true sometimes. For example, when a ten years old boy wants to play video games or use internet to watch movies all day, he will not have a chance to connect to his family or even his friends. In this case, technology does not make any connection for that boy, but we cannot blame the technology for that. Everybody has a choice to use innovations in good way or bad way.
Unambiguously, today people in different parts of the World have much more connections with each other than before by using technology.
- According to a recent report cheating among college and university students is on the rise However Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeav 50
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppo 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting you 50
- All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children s schools Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 50
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise Currently the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away thus 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, thus, for example, in addition, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 324.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90740740741 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69976176925 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552469135802 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8699860476 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.6842105263 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0526315789 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52631578947 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405714467934 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127334595909 0.0831039109588 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927529996561 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227579866248 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089235755637 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.