Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree
In recent decades, contemporaries have been increasingly paying attention to kinds of communication. While it is thought that the spoken language is superior to the writing language, I believe both of them are equally crucial in certain situations.
On the one hand, bubble communication has its own merits. Firstly, due to being time-saving and effective in transferring information, oral communication is facilitated in almost all social activities. For example, in meetings, talking directly to partners will help speakers have their feedback immediately without consuming time reading a message or text. In addition, by using spoken words accompanied by body language, the public speaker not only expresses their full opinion quickly but also influent their audience.
On the other hand, written communication is more powerful in many situations. At first, written language plays a pivotal role in exchanging and keeping long-winded and detailed information. Since it is not easy to remember all details discussed just by speaking, it is advisable to jot down all of them on paper for necessary future references. Moreover, essential documents always keep in the form of written texts. In fact, The legal contract created by the consent between the two or more parties is often made up of writing, which is a positive proof for the combination and cooperation between individuals and groups in reality.
By way of conclusion, both methods of communication are powerful in different cases. Oral communication is more effective in direct conversations, while written communication is preferable for study and law. For those reasons, people should choose the most appropriate way to show their opinion in certain circumstances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Huyenlbg87 | 11 | view |
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 73
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication 78
- Plastic shopping bags are used widely and cause many environmental problems Some people say they should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- spoken communication is more powerful than written communication Do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53383458647 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20036779219 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635338345865 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9990281715 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.142857143 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207509404321 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771410517099 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936980690599 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115117873093 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684617811575 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.