The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
Table: https://ielts-simon.com/.a/6a0120a5bb05d8970c015434c9f23f970c-pi
The given data illustrates the percentage of different types of poor families in Australia in 1999.
Overall, it is clearly seen that while levels of poverty were higher for single people than for couples, and people with children were more likely to be poor than those without, the poverty rates were considerably lower among elderly people.
Looking at the table, it is noticeable that 11% of Australians, or 1,837,000 people were living in poverty in 1999. The proportion of single-parent received the highest position, accounting for just over a fifth while that of the single people without children acted at the second of the list with 19%(359,000). In contrast, the number of single aged individuals living in poverty gain a lower figure than that of other single people, comprising a small fraction (54,000).
In terms of couples, in Australia, 12% of those with children were classed as poor meanwhile the figure for parents without children was much lower with nearly a tenth (211,000). Aged people werethe least likely to be poor, placing at the bottom of the list at just under a minority( 48,000).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | farmaniefr@gmail.com | view | |
| 2022-08-08 | whencanIpassIELTsbyscore7 | view | |
| 2021-08-12 | JennyLee | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-29 | Muhammad Hassam Saeed | view | |
| 2021-06-29 | Muhammad Hassam Saeed | view |
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Plastic shopping bags are used widely and cause many environmental problems Some people say they should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for charity improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- spoken communication is more powerful than written communication Do you agree or disagree 73
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01086956522 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58330030265 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7386593008 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.714285714 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105902887308 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658872712608 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435603938681 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0795310721649 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416399337553 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.