The given bar chart gives information about how much amount was spent on five different products (Cars, Computers, Books, Perfume and cameras) by UK and Franch in 2010. Units are measured in pounds sterling.
Overall, UK spent more money on consumer goods than France in the given period. Both the British and French used their more money for cars, while the least amount of money was spent on perfume in the UK compared to cameras in France. Moreover, the clear difference in expenditure between both countries was on cameras.
Considering the money spent on cars, as compared to France($400000), UK spent a little more amount which was $450000. Similarly, the British expenditure on books was higher than the French(around $400000 and $300000). In the UK, expenditure on cameras (above $350000) had almost doubled as compared to France that was only $150000.
On the other hand, the trend of money spend on remaining both items was reversed in between both countries. more than $350000 was spent on computers by the French, which was quite more than the British who spent exactly $350000. The lowest amount of money was gone to the perfume which was $200000 and less than $150000 by Frace and UK.
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 89
- The table below shows the production of carbon dioxide in five different countries in 2006 73
- Some people think it is more important to plant more tree in open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing To what extend do you agree or disagree 50
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The charts show the difference in how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... between both countries was on cameras. Considering the money spent on cars, as ...
^^^
Line 4, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: More
...was reversed in between both countries. more than 50000 was spent on computers by th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, similarly, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82178217822 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36979324158 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485148514851 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9512537541 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5454545455 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0734124388211 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376527465304 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466468975693 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0553589191926 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379948767076 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.