Online shopping is increasing dramatically. What are the effects on the environment and the kinds of jobs?
The trend of purchasing services and products online has been significantly burgeoning for the past few years. This phenomenon has positive impacts on both environmental and employment patterns because it causes less pollution
and creates more job opportunities for people.
Firstly, in terms of the environment, shopping wired has reduced the level of harmful gases in the atmosphere. That is to say, a majority of individuals use their private vehicles to access the shopping stores offline which ultimately lead to the increased numbers of private cars on road, which further increases the air pollution, but in the case of buying things using the internet alleviate this issue, as a single delivery truck can deliver things to more than one person in a single journey. Recent research has shown that the recent development of contacting the market using computers has deteriorated the need of using private means of transport for going to pick up products.
In regard to employment, the practice of acquiring things using websites has opened up new vistas for jobs. In other words, this process requires more personnel on works such as delivery truck drivers, delivery men, and website designers who need to update their websites from time to provide users better interface, thus this needs more workers. The shopping store in my city, for example, provides networked access to shoppers, and every month an advert is published in the local newspaper to hire people for delivering things.
On balance, reaching the shops using applications on phone has played an indispensable role in society because it helps to improve the quality of air and gives rise to the chances of work for the local community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-13 | JJsidhu | 67 | view |
| 2020-08-11 | Truong12345 | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-11 | Truong12345 | 84 | view |
| 2020-08-04 | NL | 78 | view |
| 2018-10-10 | Reham Elsayed | 80 | view |
- Most medical doctors want to work in cities where they will make a lot of money Yet in many rural areas there are not enough doctors What are the reasons for this problem How can it be solved 78
- The development in technology allows more and more machines to be used rather than human employees Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 89
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 67
- Children from 7 11 now spend more time watching television and playing video games than before What are the effects of this on children families and society What are the possible solutions to this problem 78
- Some people believe that cooking at home is a waste of time They feel it is better to buy fast food which is more convenient and less stressful in modern life Do you agree or disagree Give your opinion and examples from your own experience 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, thus, as for, for example, such as, in other words, in regard to, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19855595668 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74219036008 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613718411552 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.778150633 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.0 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7777777778 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1111111111 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0810828949422 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0327416634822 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255141361215 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0472662123256 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218047281092 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, thus, as for, for example, such as, in other words, in regard to, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19855595668 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74219036008 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613718411552 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.778150633 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.0 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.7777777778 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1111111111 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0810828949422 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0327416634822 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0255141361215 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0472662123256 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218047281092 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.