Team vs individual sports benefits has been a matter of contention. Some people hold firm to the belief that team-plays bring more advantages, whereas others are of the opinion that competing as individuals is better for players. From my viewpoint, both notions require further deliberation.
On the one hand, diverse perspectives and teamwork skills are worth contemplating. Apparently, provide plenty of choices of strategy that allow players to try different ways in matches. For instance, a football team with a range of options can gradually determine their most suitable tactic by applying various members’ ideas in practice. More notably, because the final result in team sports hinges on the entire team, players are forced to work and coordinate smoothly with other members if they want to achieve the goals. Hence, participating in a sports team is a great idea to enhance teamwork skills, which is necessary for everyone in doing daily tasks such as school projects or business work.
On the other hand, flexibility and self-reliance are of paramount importance to individual sports. Apparently, self-paced practicing offers players to work at their own pace with their strategy, plan schedule, environment and no impact by the play style of others. To illustrate, perfect coordination is compulsory in football matches whereas a run athlete can change his tactic every time to get better results. Besides, autonomy provides the chance to avoid bad quality work from others as work in a team when success is entirely dependent on their own efforts. In the absence of impacts, individual sport athletes can’t blame anyone else for their failure, thereby teaching them to be responsible for their own actions and decisions.
All in all, team sports offer diverse perspectives and teamwork skills while individual sports provide the opportunity for flexibility and self-reliance. According to me, each type has its advantages so people in crosswalk ought to thoroughly consider the aforementioned notion to make the right decision.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 89
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005 Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea and make comparisons where appropriate 73
- The flow charts shows the production of cement and concrete 89
- The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problem and instead of increase funding into urgent and more threatening issue such as global warming To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...nity for flexibility and self-reliance. According to me, each type has its advantages so people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, hence, if, so, whereas, while, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.403125 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93536990588 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628125 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9624267976 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.266666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192013253834 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637421696221 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585200947639 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133534991536 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627870314762 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.