The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009.
Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie chart compares the proportion of principal modes of transport being communated to university in two separate years, namely 2004 and 2009.
Overall, it is apparent, meanwhile, the share of car and bus accounted for the largest one of the total, that of walking had an opposite pattern. Also, noticeable was that except for car, the rest of means increased significantly during the time given.
In 2004, the proportion of car stood out, with the figures being more half. This was followed by bus, capturing a third one third. Regarding the remaining means, walking, train and bicycle comprised nearly number zero in the first year, approximately at 4%, 3% and 9% respectively.
In 2009, starting at 33%, the percentage of bus was the dominant, reaching a peak at 46%. The firgure for car witnessed a steady decline, at almost a quarter of the total. That of others means, however, climbed slightly over to 2-5%, users spent on walking, train and bicycle the lowest of the budget
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- The graph shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 71
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, regarding, so, third, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96428571429 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66772938008 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1167204943 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6666666667 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0940589013742 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0373170690643 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540669049864 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0666885613928 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654084281341 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.