The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table shows changes in percentages of cinemagoers regardless of ages while the line chart illustrates/ compares the average of movie attendance based on 4 different age brackets in Australia between 1996 and 2000.
Overall, although there was an increasing number of Australians attending cinemas, the average annual visits decreased over the given time. Additionally, it is evident that the changes in cinema visits of all ages followed a parallel pattern, albeit at different rates.
Considering the table, there was 62 % of the Australian population going to the cinema in 1996. This number reached its peak after a year, at 72%, where it plateaued afterwards, except for a slight decrease in 1999. Meanwhile, a minor increase in the frequency was recorded in 1997 which went up from 10.3 to 11.1, however, the figure dipped to 8.2 1999.
It can be seen from the second chart that the older people got, the less they visited the cinema despite years. In 1996, the average number of cinema visits lay between 10 and 15/ year, in which the younger age group visiting cinema slightly more than the older group. The average cinema attendance of all the surveyed age groups fluctuated similarly from 10 to 25/ year throughout the given period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-21 | nvtrung309 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
- Topic Some people say that art such as painting music poetry can be made by everyone whereas believing that it can be only made by those with special abilities Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The number of passengers using three rail networks from 1950 to 2010
- Topic many people put their personal information online address telephone number and so on for purposes such as signing up for social networks or online banking Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 89
- The number of passengers using three rail networks from 1950 to 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, similarly, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05769230769 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62385120251 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3730442766 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.888888889 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329745074298 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131020733311 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792584665222 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18712597959 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799898139072 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.