The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart illustrates information behind reasons about agricultural land why less productive overall the world and the table shows data about the affected region worldwide.
the main reason behind the lead this degradation of land overgrazing in the whole world. most of the land 235 is affected in Europe and the leading cause is deforestation and North America 5% is less affected by deforestation in the 1990s.
Overall the world 35% land is degraded by over_grazing although 30% is caused by deforestation. 28% land affected by over-cultivation. these three reasons affect above 90% and only 7% affected by others.
In Europe, 9.8% of the land is affected by deforestation although North America is 0.2% affected by this. Oceania land also affected 1.7% by deforestation however with over-cultivation not effect this regions land. With over-cultivation, Europe is the most affected region With 7.7% land and the land of North America is 3.3% degradation. By overgrazing, Oceania affect most of the land 11% and NorthAmerica with least 1.5% land degradation
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 58
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important Why might this be the case Is this a positive or negative development 56
- Many think that in today s world it is very difficult for people to maintain a healthy lifestyle Others however feel that it is easy for people to be healthy and fit if they want to be Discuss both views and give your opinion 59
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... about the affected region worldwide. the main reason behind the lead this degrad...
^^^
Line 2, column 90, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Most
...of land overgrazing in the whole world. most of the land 235 is affected in Europe a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
... 28% land affected by over-cultivation. these three reasons affect above 90% and only...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ove 90% and only 7% affected by others. In Europe, 9.8% of the land is affected ...
^^^
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by this. Oceania land also affected 1.7% by deforestation however with over-culti...
^^
Line 4, column 191, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...ation however with over-cultivation not effect this regions land. With over-cultivatio...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...America with least 1.5% land degradation
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31952662722 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26208890847 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497041420118 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9703935603 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.13902439024 878% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309956660745 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138635421095 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841090938673 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221820848377 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927486182245 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.