A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu

Essay topics:

A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.

In recent years, many concerns about human actions towards animals have been of interest in many parts of the world. While there is a school of thought that animal rights should be afforded the same consideration as similar one of human beings, I have also heard that animals are used not only as food but also as studies.
On the one hand, human actions have led to painfulness and violence for animals, according to humanitarian and religious beliefs. As a result of food and experiments, people should be struggling for animals’ rights. It is believed that humans are able to find other supplements for food, both of tests instead of using animals, as well. Whereas humans can use many kinds of agricultural products to eat, for example, beans can be substituted for animal protein, eating animals’ physical bodies would not be necessary that is compared with murder in many religious beliefs like Buddhism. When it comes to experimenting with animals, it is also argued why humans can bring harmfulness or vulnerability to animals because of medicine and vaccines used for ourselves. According to surveys of a non-profit group, animals are suffering from being kept in small cages or violence due to scientific research.
On the other hand, it is the opposite that animals should be employed to meet humans’ demands of both food and studies. Without any doubt, almost all humans have been familiar with food sources made from animals, despite the ideas of the minority of vegetarians over the world. Animals’ bodies contain loads of rich vitamins, as well as nutrients that vegetables cannot replace. In addition, unless humans found out a safer and more effective method to practice experiments such as on the production of brand-new medicine, and testing the effectiveness of vaccines, animals, for instance, mice and flies, would still be the best choice by scientists. Those things would serve for advancements of human beings, which will lead to better life later.
In conclusion, both using animals for food and research and the rights for animals have still been debated that each would exist right to some extent. Hope that scientists can give steps of technology to restrict the pain of animals in later life.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-12-19 mytinh 84 view
2022-12-18 snowacealex 84 view
2022-12-17 Alexspector 56 view
2022-12-17 Lê Nguyễn Hạnh Dung 73 view
2022-12-06 bapcai 73 view
Essays by user Lunar Tran :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 17, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d but also as studies. On the one hand, human actions have led to painfulness an...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07065217391 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68900389847 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551630434783 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2239799351 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.4 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2666666667 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400298484977 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144987477061 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902583738187 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257066398626 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438554228733 0.056905535591 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.