The two figures compare the differences between the map of the cinema in 1980 and that of the present time.
Overall, it is noticeable that the majority of the infrastructures of the cinema have been relocated and increased in the number, while some places are constantly in use.
The old car park which was once opposite the entry is removed and the cinema 2 now occupies the north-west area and the cinema 3 takes up the north-east one. Other two cinemas are built in a row behind the third units, just next to the former Drinks which is replaced by the DVD shop. The new Food Drinks shop and the added relax room have been in the left side of the entry which led the Cinema 1 to moving forward.
However, the entry from 1980 is still located in the middle of the south, next to the ticket room which has been functioning up to now. The restroom remains in the same area but recently stands between the cinema 1 and cinema 2.
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950
- The pictures show the layout of a cinema in 1980 and the same cinema now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 76
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950
- The pictures show the layout of a cinema in 1980 and the same cinema now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 764.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4161849711 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30002607606 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560693641618 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.8850418148 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.142857143 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199321573004 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995662259497 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519463907045 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122897553016 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414764052865 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.