Human activities have negative effects on plants and animals species. Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem. Others believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Human interference has adverse impacts on flora and fauna. It is appreciated that nothing can be done anymore to ameliorate this phenomenon while others believe that actions can contribute to the betterment of this situation. Both these schools of thought hold valid arguments. This essay will take both sides into consideration and give my verdict.
On the one hand, some damage caused by humans to animals and plants is irreversible. Initially, overexploitation has been posing several threats to plants, even contributing to their extinction. For example, wild American ginsengs, which were put on the endangered list because of overharvesting for the herbal trade, have been completely wiped out since the 20th century. Besides, some polar animals such as bearded seals and walruses run a higher risk of losing their habitats due to global warming, which is caused by burning fossil fuels and cutting forests. The only way to repair these consequences is turning back the hand of time, which only exists in fairy tales.
On the other hand, there are some feasible solutions to protect biodiversity. One of them is for the legislators to replace lenient environmental laws with stricter ones. This can serve as a deterrent to environmental pollution, thus protecting the habitat of flora and fauna. Moreover, poaching, hunting, and harvesting wild species should be banned and people should stop consuming products from imperiled species such as elephants’ tusks so that jeopardized species would not be put in such threat of extinction. I truly believe that by taking these measures, endangered animals and plant species can be saved.
In conclusion, although some damage to nature is irreversible, I hold a strong belief that actions can be done to curb several problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-26 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2022-12-03 | trucvy112233 | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | Priyanksuthar | 56 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | ttha | 67 | view |
| 2022-05-30 | Cicihg | 89 | view |
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport However others think money should be spent on other priorities ex cost environment Discuss both views and give opinions 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33215547703 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92817540288 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628975265018 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0330664097 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220238256905 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068010381935 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058694150662 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126145073906 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644111598338 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.