Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species. Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem. Others believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
There are several human activities that have done great damage to floras and faunas. While some people say that it has no chance to alleviate this problem, others think the negative circumstance could be mitigated by efficient solutions. This essay will discuss both views before reaching the conclusion that it is not too late to take actions.
On the one hand, it is argued that humans could not bring any methods to reduce the influences on other species because a large number of those were extinct. Particularly, numerous activities of people such as jogging, hunting or deforestation lead to the vanishing of some species. For example, Dodo is one of species that disappeared due to humans and in the long term, there may be no way to bring it back. Moreover, many species which are endangered could not be preserved properly as necessary sources are insufficient. To explain, activities of humans have not only destroyed the habitat of floras and faunas but also reduced those food supplies. As a consequence, it is difficult to take solutions even though people have an awareness to protect these species.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that people could mitigate this situation since a great number of solutions are conducted. To be specific, these days, people are much more concerned about the importance of forests, so there are many planting tree campaigns all over the world. Take Vietnam as an example, the Arbour Day is organised annually in order to encourage citizens greening the country. Furthermore, the development of technology may contribute to maintaining the existence of plants and animals. Some nations in the world have successfully applied this field on preserving several species, such as China’s method utilised to save pandas. Clearly, although these solutions may not restore to former situations, the more actions people take, the closer they can get.
To sum up, although some people still claim that it is too late to alleviate problems that are harmful to plants and animals, I am of the view that effective measures like planting more trees and using technology may alter this circumstance positively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...the influences on other species because a large number of those were extinct. Particularly, numer...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...may alter this circumstance positively.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, for example, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15056818182 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74913115501 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565340909091 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8128817606 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.3125 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343490056475 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942097001864 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670813350347 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213077088627 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704542458212 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.