Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice. There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system. Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring planet, Mars, some think that sending people to an asteroid would actually be the best colonization option for a number of reasons Low Gravity To begin with, asteroids are often much smaller than planets, so they have lower gravity.
Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss asteroids, a kind of huge space object made from rock and ice. We can find a large amount of them in our solar system. The article states that sending humans to an asteroid would be a great idea for colonization and mentions three ideas about that. However, the professor disagrees with these ideas.
First, the article states that the asteroids are smaller than other planets so they also have lower gravity, and spacecraft can take off easier. In contrast, the professor mentions that low gravity is harmful to the human body and makes curios health problems. The low gravity decreases the muscles and bones density so it has a negative effect.
Second, the reading passage claims that some asteroids have plentiful metal sources that are scarce on earth such as platinum and gold. The colonists can mine minerals and send them to earth. However, the professor disagrees with this idea and he states that the cost of support colony is high and there is no guarantee the metals supplies be profitable, it might be the sending these materials to the earth be cost full.
Finally, the reading mentions that most of the asteroids get closer to earth than the moon so getting to asteroids and going back from there is easy, for example, a trip to Mars requires much more time close to two years. The professor refutes this idea by saying that returns from asteroids also take time. The asteroids move away and traveling there and going back is challenging.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | xujia | 75 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | YasamanEsml | 32 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | YasamanEsml | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | YasamanEsml | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | YasamanEsml | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is often not a good thing for people to move to a new town or country because they lose their old friends 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and examples 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long 66
- Scientists are considering the possibility of sending humans to Mars in the coming decades Although there have been successful manned missions to the Moon in the 1960s and 1970s Mars is 150 times further away from Earth than the Moon is Thus the project o 86
- Hail pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field Over the last few decades a method of 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...here and going back is challenging.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, second, so, for example, in contrast, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84555984556 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31725216111 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579150579151 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9168867593 49.2860985944 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5384615385 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215961344634 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692244547191 0.0996497079465 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644513926382 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124360802055 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916574410833 0.0443174109184 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.