Utilization of park space has been a matter of contention. Some people hold firm to the belief that those public areas could better serve purposes like building housing or developing business. From my perspective, I absolutely disagree with this notion.
First and foremost, health maintenance is prioritized for discussion. It cannot be denied that green places with trees and plants can absorb carbon dioxide and produce oxygen, thereby making air quality better and cooler the atmosphere for citizens. Studies show that spending time in nature like a park of trees makes a drop in anxiety and depression. This kind of system is especially necessary in urban areas, which have industrialized and release many emissions and exhaust fumes.
In the second place, a healthy playground is of equal importance to utilization of park space. Apparently, a park is a good place for everyone to exercise and stay fit, build a stronger body or just walk simply and enjoy the fresh air. Besides, local administration also can use parks to organize community events and amusement activities for residents. This will bring people together and closer, then establish a healthier and happier society, which can motivate people to work productively.
Last but not least, a better solution is worth contemplating. In fact, growing population cannot be solved, business cannot be developed and economies cannot be boosted completely by using those green areas. Alternatively, government and local administrations should introduce new laws or rules
All in all, not only health maintenance but a healthy playground and better solutions are the obligations of the utilization of park space. Local authorities ought to thoroughly consider the aforementioned notion to make the right decision.
- The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your opinions 92
- The government should reduce the amount of money spent on local environmental problem and instead of increase funding into urgent and more threatening issue such as global warming To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 67
- the illustrations show how chocolate is produced 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tions should introduce new laws or rules All in all, not only health maintenance ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, first, second, so, then, in fact, kind of, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41516245487 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00641184241 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657039711191 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9179945362 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293808025358 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785061156396 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468584688505 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142528250064 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583925723048 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.