Some people claim that not enough of wast from homes is recycled. They say that, the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are need to make people recycle more of thair waste?
It is believed by some group of individual, in contemporary era, more than million tons of wastes have been produced, which is from home. Nevertheless, it is not enough for recycling. Therefore, they think government ought to have a policy to increase recycling. I support to this statement to a large extent for some reasons. My view points will be elaborated in ensuing paragraphs.
There are many ways to increase rate of recycling, for most one is, governments should provide more facilities. For example, if the facilities of bags, Dustbin and garbage collecting vehicle provided by governments. Which is beneficial for environment as well as it is increase rate of recycling. Moreover, authorities ought to create rules and regulation regarding the waste. For instance, ministry have to aware public by the use of posters or LED screens at public places.
How to increase value of recycling? Despite that, spread knowledge by use of media, social media, movie advertisement and news papers. To illustrate, nowadays, social media is very popular. Because of public have more trust on social media and they are more intrested in such things. So, if management telecast information on recycling of waste thorough social media. It is not only help to increase rate of recycling, but also it is help for circulating awareness on public.
On the other hand, authority should not create rules and they should not provide facilities. Because of few people are not able to follow rules and some public are abuse provided facilities.
To conclude, socity waste is not enough for recycling. Therefore, some believe government ought to create rules for increasing rate of recycling. While, spread information of recycling by use of advertisement, social media and news papers. However, some people abused given facilities. I think it is good idea to elevate recycling.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-31 | AATIF AIYUB SALEH | 56 | view |
| 2020-12-21 | chathurika | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Noah1997 | 95 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Noah1997 | 56 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 56
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel or work in a foreign country Other say that these are not only reasons Why someone should learn a foreign language Discuss both these views and give your opinion 56
- Some people claim that not enough of wast from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are need to make people recycle more of thair waste 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ividual, in contemporary era, more than million tons of wastes have been produced, whic...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...they are more intrested in such things. So, if management telecast information on recy...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ia and news papers. However, some people abused given facilities. I think it is g...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20265780731 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92410520947 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521594684385 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.4084962644 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.0869565217 106.682146367 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0869565217 20.7667163134 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.60869565217 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241653916388 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731227907852 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526626750258 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136182230846 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562911702954 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.99 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.